A Lesson Learned: Americans Want to Watch the World End

Posted by Adam Sweeney (adam@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 24, 2009

lesson-knowing

Put the peace pipe down and throw your neighbor’s hand to the side. If there’s anything to be learned from this week’s box office numbers, it’s that Americans love to watch the world burn.

“Why does the sun go on shining
Why does the sea rush to shore
Don’t they know it’s the end of the world?”

- Nina Gordon

As film lovers, we have resigned ourselves to the fact that good films don’t equal big box office returns and vice versa. Knowing, starring Nicolas Cage, proves the notion as it brought in over $24 million this weekend, beating out the stronger cast and script of I Love You, Man. Could it be that Nicolas Cage’s puppy dog look won us over? Doubtful. Cage has shown he is a good actor when he wants to be, but the strong showing at theaters has more to do with our thirst to see our species destroyed.

If the apocalyptic paint by the numbers film were the first of its kind to rise to the top, we could dismiss it. But we all know that isn’t the case. The Happening, M. Night Shyamalan’s inexplicably poor effort, made $31 million on the opening weekend. We love Zooey Deschanel as much as the next person but there is no way that film should have made as much as it did. The promise of our destruction carried us into the seats, just like the “Happening” carried that sewing needle into that girl’s neck. Some might argue that a few people went to the the theater with hopes of saving M. Night’s career from being destroyed, but let’s take the topics one at a time.

Films that chronicle the world’s tragic demise are nothing new. La Fin Du Monde (1931) examined how a world disaster has the potential to unify and strengthen human relationships. Fast forward sixty-four years later and we saw Zack Snyder’s Watchmen exploring the same idea to the tune of $55 million on the opening weekend. It seems that not even a sagging economy can stop moviegoers from burning the cash in their wallets to watch the world end. Is life imitating art?

A look at the opening weekend numbers of some of the highest grossing disaster films of the past fifteen years helps us understand that we don’t necessarily have to have an award worthy disaster film to be intrigued. The Tomatometer at Rotten Tomatoes, which determines an overall rating based on critics’ reviews of a film, help prove our point that a good film and getting the green don’t go hand in hand. (Tomatometer rating is next to the film title, followed by the film’s opening weekend at the box office.)

  • Independence Day - 62% – $50,000,000
  • War of the Worlds -  73% – $64,000,000
  • Armageddon – 40% – $36,000,000
  • Deep Impact – 46% – $41,000,000
  • The Day After Tomorrow - 45% – $68,000,000
  • I Am Legend – 69% – $77,000,000

Maybe it makes sense that these films, which are heavy on the special effects, would be lacking in story. We can push our connection with the people to the side so long as we get shiny objects and images that entertain us. Apply that same statement to the current state of America concerning interpersonal relationships and it would hold true. You don’t need Tom Cruise running from aliens to see the connection.

Could it be that we have grown tired of the rhetoric existing with the countless wars the American government is waging? We have the war on terror, the war on drugs and I wouldn’t doubt it if we have the war on women carrying small dogs in handbags, perhaps the only war of the three we can actually win in a concrete manner. Maybe the reason we desire to fight a war outside of our understanding or actual means is to counteract our inability to succeed in the battles at hand outside of the theater.

Is it unrealistic to think that disaster films allow us to live out our desires to loosen the suffocating grip that technology, consumerism and industrialization has over our lives? On the other side, could disaster films passively act out our underlying notion of patriotism so that we don’t have to do it in real life? Why join the army when Will Smith will do it for us? Or could it be as simple as understanding that people just want to go the movie theater to see shit get blown up. I’ll leave it up to you to decide, although it’s my belief that the answer is probably all of the above.

Maybe it’s time that we accept the fact that world peace, as wonderful as it sounds, doesn’t sound like a great theme for a film. We would be much happier if we get to see Bruce Willis, some sort of national monument destroyed and an ending that puts the U back in the U.S. of A. Don’t we know it’s the end of the world? Judging by the box office numbers, it seems like we do and we love it.


Read more articles by Adam Sweeney

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Samir
    Here Here...on the other hand, movies like the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy didn't fair well and that pretty much started with the earth exploding. I'm calling you out Neil, Americans hate watching the World blow up

    And we hate Nic Cage, whether he be in National Treasure or Knowing.
  • Thanks for calling me out, but Adam actually wrote this article. :)
  • Murray Fan
    It's true. This man has no dick.
  • Mladen
    It wouldn't be fair to call Hitchhikers an apocalyptic film, except in an ironic sense. And if there's anything film-goers hate, its irony
  • Mladen
    The love for apocalypse goes back way further than that. Its been popular in literature for centuries. Just about every single historic culture and religion on earth has an apocalypse story.

    I think 'blowing shit up' is just a bonus. The real draw is our own obsession with the end of the world, which ties into our own fear of death. Most apocalypse stories also imply a renewal or rebirth. Life after death.
  • I won't say how I saw Knowing but I would have been sick if I spent money to see it! I rented The Happening and after watching it I walked out in my yard hoping the grass would ease my pain from watching that crap! 31 MILLION?! Was it the only movie playing that weekend?
  • Oddly enough, The Incredible Hulk and Kung Fu Panda both beat it out on opening weekend. Imagine how much it would have made if those films weren't there. (Shudders.)
  • Samir
    Too bad...I'm still calling you out. Keep Bicycling
  • Calling Knowing "paint by numbers" makes me feel like you didn't even watch it - no offense (unless you didn't watch it =P). I mean, look at the movies you listed, like Armageddon, I Am Legend, Deep Impact, etc, most of the time the Earth is spared. There is a happy ending for almost everyone. In Armageddon, the asteroid doesn't hit. In Deep Impact, it does, but you get a rousing speech at the end and all the characters you care about, ofr the most part, survive. Humans always come out on top, the Earth always survives.

    Not this time. The movie literally destroys the entire Earth. How much further away can you be from the numbers? It also added a mystery to the plot. No "Hey, the Earth is going to die because of this and now we have to try to avoid/stop it." You didn't know the world was going to die for awhile into it. You thought, somehow that everyone would survive. Then toss in Aliens! Aliens that were Earths inspirations for Angels and thus probably Heaven and God, meaning that those things don't exist. Nic Cage takes solace with his religious father - a father who dedicated his life to something that doesn't exist. Then the Earth burns to death.

    Just because a few breeding pairs of humans were dropped on some sweet new planet doesn't mean you can call it a happy ending. The vast majority of almost 7 billion people died. (It's estimated that the human population was as low as 1000-7500 breeding pairs at various times. So theoretically they could have killed 6,768,983,411 people.) The main characters died. There was deeper substance. So while I agree people like to see the World be threatened and big shit go boom, I'd whole heartedly disagree that Knowing was "by the numbers."
  • Doesn't Knowing showing Earth being destroyed qualify as watching the world end? ;)
blog comments powered by Disqus