8 Things About the New Star Trek Movie That Will Blow You Away

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on May 6, 2009

trek-list-header

I’ve had my chance to hoot and holler all over the place about the latest entry in the Star Trek franchise from director J.J. Abrams. But as you might expect, I’m not quite done yet. For those who haven’t heard yet, I absolutely loved Trek on a multitude of levels. Director J.J. Abrams and crew have crafted a film that is both reverent and fresh, one that should not only play well with Trekkers, but also with mainstream audiences. It has led many of us here at Reject HQ to believe that it could be one of the runaway hits of the summer. Which leads me back to a little gushing — some unapologetic love for my now second favorite — second only to The Hurt Locker — movie of 2009. That said, I would like to present one more chunk of love, from a non-Trekker to the world, in my list of the 8 Things About the New Star Trek Movie That Will Blow You Away…

8. Zachary Quinto, That Pointy Eared Bastard

trek-list-8

When this film was announced at Comic-Con two years ago, it was also announced that Zachary Quinto (Heroes) would be playing Spock. Not long after that the rest of the cast came together, including some very odd choices. But all along, I was sold on Zach as Spock. He had the look, had the acting chops and even though there were many out there who were waiting for a Spock/Sylar hybrid, I was contending that he alone would stand tall in this film. And he does. He stands right alongside the original Spock, Leonard Nimoy, and delivers a dynamic performance, bringing new life and new depth to a classic favorite.

7. Kirk and Spock: Best Friends Forever

trek-list-7

One of the big question marks heading into this film was Chris Pine as Captain Kirk. Would he fit well in the shoes of Shatner? Even more importantly, would he and Quinto capture that famous chemistry between Kirk and Spock, the friendship to end all friendships. In a word, yes. Not only does Pine deliver his own version of the sarcastic, irreverent and tough Kirk, he also works well in balance with the stoic, emotionless Spock played by Quinto. This is important to fans and can be considered as yet another big win for the film.

6. Commitment to Character, Story and Reverence

trek-list-6

If there is one complaint I’ve heard about the writing of Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci (Transformers), it is that their scripts lack depth and are more committed to big bangs than big arcs. And for the most part, these inferences have been true up until this and the TV show Fringe. Here they show some real chops by delivering a Star Trek film that captures the essence of these characters. They are different versions of Kirk, Spock, Scotty and Bones, but they are fresh and reverent new versions. And their origin as a team is woven together with a surprisingly smart story — I can’t think of a better way to bring this new old crew together.

5. The Enterprise: She’s a Big, Beautiful Girl, Isn’t She?

trek-list-5

Inside and out, the new USS Enterprise is a wonder. She’s built like a brick shithouse in space. One thing that the original series was always limited by was showing off the grand scale of such a ship. There’s nothing wrong with that, as the Trek of old was technologically limited. Not the case here. In Abrams’ vision, the Enterprise is a massive, complex vessel that carries a huge crew through space. Where you really feel it is in the Enterprise’s first shot in the film as it sits ready to rock in space and in shots of the engine room — a vast room with endless pipelines carrying what can only be assumed are unfathomable amounts of cable, or whatever they use in the future. The point is that the Enterprise is bigger (inside and out) than it has ever been before.

4. Classic Moments: Red Shirts and Rich Quotes

trek-list-4

Without revealing too much — as I would urge you to experience it for yourself — I will say that there are plenty of great little treats in the film for Star Trek fans new and old. There is an unfortunate situation for a red shirt that doesn’t disappoint, as well as a classic Scotty moment that will have fans cheering. In fact, if cheers from Trek-fans are any indicator, this film is full of nostalgic moments. That, and might I mention a guy who says “Dammit I’m a doctor, not a physicist”…

3. Karl Urban: The New ‘Bones’ McCoy

trek-list-3

Perhaps the most awe-inspiring performance in this Trek is Karl Urban as Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy. One of the long-time great characters, Bones was made famous by Deforest Kelley, who would certainly have been very proud of Urban’s performance. He delivers Bones as the compassionate, irascible old doctor that fans grew to love. He even employed a dialect coach to get the accent down — and get it down he did. Need some advance evidence, check out the Meet Dr. McCoy clip that we posted a while back.

2. The Perfection of Sound

trek-list-2

If there is one thing I was expecting from the third trailer that was released for Star Trek, it was a big sweeping score. And Michael Giacchino’s score is big and beautiful — it has a booming, thunderous quality to it that elevates the intensity of the film. But even more impressive is the sound design, which was a collaborative effort between Supervising Sound Editor Mark Stoeckinger, Sound Designer Harry Cohen and Sound Designer Ben Burtt (Star Wars, Wall-E). The first moment that we see the Enterprise go into warp is a truly astounding experience, a resounding boom that may just knock you out of your seat. As well, there is an attention to detail in the sound design — a great array of bleeps and boops — that give the Enterprise life. As the characters live out the story, we always feel as if the old girl is right there with them, living, breathing and lumbering along through space.

1. Big, Sexy Space Battles

trek-list-1

The one thing that I liked most about Star Trek was the way they handled the big space battles, of which there are many. And it isn’t just because there was a ton of “awe, cool” CG-filled moments with explosions galore. What Abrams and Co. got right was the scale of the battles and the lumbering nature of the crafts involved. It is important to remember that these are gigantic ships — as I mentioned above when talking about the Enterprise. And gigantic spacecrafts don’t zig-zag around the galaxy swiftly, running circles around each other in the heat of battle. These scenes felt massive, like their participant ships, and even moreso, the action overall was more like a chess match than a boxing match, something that may delight die hard fans.

Star Trek is in theaters on May 8, 2009.


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • This movie is going to be the bomb, baby! It will blow up everyone minds who see it by seeing it, was not meant to see by anyone because its too good but anyway I'm seeing it either way. I hope my mind don't get blown away by this, wish me luck that I don’t die by watching it. New Star Trek party at last!
  • Just saw it last night, the sound and cinematography made me want to explode with amazement. Cinematography is a very long shot (Read: Nearly impossible) but if the sound department doesn't get its due at the Oscars with at least a nomination I'll be VERY disappointed.

    Oh, and I knew nothing about Star Trek going in and loved it (When I mean nothing, I mean nothing, I had never heard of a Romulan or Uhura). After seeing this though, I've gotta say that Bones is my favorite character of 2009 so far...just barely above Dr. Manhattan.
  • andrew
    yeah i've been psyched for this for a while. can't wait for this. the summer now officially starts with this release!
  • Chille
    I can't wait to see this! Unfortunately I was invited to a huge party, ON MAY 8TH. I almost considered not going, but then I asked myself: What kind of person would I be if I considered seeing Star Trek instead of going to the party?
  • Brian
    The film is not a homage to the Original Star Trek. It is,a blatant rebranding of the story in an effort to commercialize the icon more. . At its worse this movie is not a tribute. It is a mockery of that story line and the principles used to explore th human condition.
    The Story line is not implausible it is impossible. The audience has to ignore physics and the entire history of Star Trek. Abrams and Paramount obviously want a new direction by destorying all but the useful onliners and sight gags. And that is what they do.
    This story line is about the ME generation. Getting what you want when you want regardless of your responsiblity to others. The main characters, with some exceptions, turn out to be amoral opportunists. Unpricinpled and violent. This movie glorifies the malevolent rule breakers, the inexperienced pretty boys who have earned nothing except what was given to them.
    You learn about the creator through his creation. And this movie tell us all we need to know about the writers, the director and the cast who signed up for this. And the future of Star Trek.



    But then again
  • Have you seen it, or are you shooting from the lip?
  • wansai
    I watched it last night and it's nothing like you described. Kirk was a rebel who got promoted and demoted ad nauseum because of his rule-breaking. Kirk, Spock and Bones are different facets of the human character. Each flawed but weighted/balance and strengthened by the others' characters "flaws".

    These 3 are the dynamics and the very soul and essence of Star Trek. I know the franchise has come so far as to romanticise political correctness and devotion to rules; but Star Trek started and lives on based on the breaking of rules. The very Star Trek universe is built around individuals defying the collective in servitude to duty and the belief that there's no such thing as "an impossible situation". The enterprise built its reputation on bending and breaking all Starfleet rgeulations.
  • BrianK
    (See USS Farragaut) Kirk was a caculated and pricincipled risk taker not an anarchist who throws punches if he doesnt get his way.The rule breaking which is being fixating on is not the intelligent and courageous adaptation to a fluid, dangerous situation. It is anarchy. If all of Starfleet were rulebreakers this would be the Earth Empire, not the Federation. Two very different things.
    The term "political correctness" has been used to deride principled action to long. And Star Trek was not the Pirates of the Carribean in Space. Starfleet is an institution, iconservative in nature, with a mission that is an inherently "liberal" point of view. These characters were devoted to high pricinciples and goals. Very American if you ask me.

    And yes the "No Win" scenario is real. And you saw the test of character at the beginning of the movie. He passed with flying colors.It is and always been a test of our character. Perhaps you just haven't faced your "Kobi Yashi Maru" yet. How we act in life is as important as how we faced death. Sometimes it's not our death we face.
  • Venture82
    Oh Brian, if only you had a clue how far your head is up your own ass...get off your high horse and actually watch the film.

    Star Trek was choking on its own convoluted and ridiculous continuity, and I would know-I'm a lifelong fan. Now it's got a chance to survive instead of sputtering and dying, which is the real tribute to Gene Roddenberry's creative vision.
  • What I find somewhat humorous is McCoy's nickname of "Bones". The funny part is the FOX series where the pathologist is also nicknamed Bones". The question is did she get her name from McCoy?
blog comments powered by Disqus