<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu-ray Patrol: Transformers on Blu-ray vs. HD-DVD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/dvd-reviews/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-125522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-125522</guid>
		<description>1080i v. 1080p is a useless comparison for a moving picture. And COMPLETELY useless on any CRT screen, as they suck at progressive scan. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1080i v. 1080p is a useless comparison for a moving picture. And COMPLETELY useless on any CRT screen, as they suck at progressive scan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-201249</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-201249</guid>
		<description>1080i v. 1080p is a useless comparison for a moving picture. And COMPLETELY useless on any CRT screen, as they suck at progressive scan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1080i v. 1080p is a useless comparison for a moving picture. And COMPLETELY useless on any CRT screen, as they suck at progressive scan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-115843</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-115843</guid>
		<description>I have a couple of movies on both formats.  And although 1080p is 1080p I always notice a better picture quality on the HD versions of movies (even though my HD player is the 360 add on).  In my BD movies, there are a ton of artifacts and &quot;fuzz&quot; in black or dark scenes.  Perhaps this is due to the throughput of data transfer is higher on HD than BD?  It is nice having the full uncompressed sound (in most cases) with BD but I am going to miss the awesome picture of HD though (unless BD improves).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of movies on both formats.  And although 1080p is 1080p I always notice a better picture quality on the HD versions of movies (even though my HD player is the 360 add on).  In my BD movies, there are a ton of artifacts and &#8220;fuzz&#8221; in black or dark scenes.  Perhaps this is due to the throughput of data transfer is higher on HD than BD?  It is nice having the full uncompressed sound (in most cases) with BD but I am going to miss the awesome picture of HD though (unless BD improves).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-201248</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-201248</guid>
		<description>I have a couple of movies on both formats.  And although 1080p is 1080p I always notice a better picture quality on the HD versions of movies (even though my HD player is the 360 add on).  In my BD movies, there are a ton of artifacts and &quot;fuzz&quot; in black or dark scenes.  Perhaps this is due to the throughput of data transfer is higher on HD than BD?  It is nice having the full uncompressed sound (in most cases) with BD but I am going to miss the awesome picture of HD though (unless BD improves).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of movies on both formats.  And although 1080p is 1080p I always notice a better picture quality on the HD versions of movies (even though my HD player is the 360 add on).  In my BD movies, there are a ton of artifacts and &#8220;fuzz&#8221; in black or dark scenes.  Perhaps this is due to the throughput of data transfer is higher on HD than BD?  It is nice having the full uncompressed sound (in most cases) with BD but I am going to miss the awesome picture of HD though (unless BD improves).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfgrin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-107489</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfgrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-107489</guid>
		<description>Yes, 1080p is 1080p, but that&#039;s resolution, not quality (seriously, who is this guy?)
The bitrate is eaqually, if not more important, and that&#039;s where bluray can truly excel, with it&#039;s superior memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 1080p is 1080p, but that&#8217;s resolution, not quality (seriously, who is this guy?)<br />
The bitrate is eaqually, if not more important, and that&#8217;s where bluray can truly excel, with it&#8217;s superior memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfgrin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-201247</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfgrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-201247</guid>
		<description>Yes, 1080p is 1080p, but that&#039;s resolution, not quality (seriously, who is this guy?)
The bitrate is eaqually, if not more important, and that&#039;s where bluray can truly excel, with it&#039;s superior memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 1080p is 1080p, but that&#8217;s resolution, not quality (seriously, who is this guy?)<br />
The bitrate is eaqually, if not more important, and that&#8217;s where bluray can truly excel, with it&#8217;s superior memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ife hearted</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-201246</link>
		<dc:creator>ife hearted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-201246</guid>
		<description>informative, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>informative, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ife hearted</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/blu-ray-patrol-transformers-on-blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.php/comment-page-1#comment-107375</link>
		<dc:creator>ife hearted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=13675#comment-107375</guid>
		<description>informative, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>informative, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 201/359 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 00:41:16 -->
