<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baby Mama, Leatherheads Find Infertility on Blu-ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/dvd-reviews/baby-mama-leatherheads-find-infertility-on-blu-ray.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/baby-mama-leatherheads-find-infertility-on-blu-ray.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Funn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/baby-mama-leatherheads-find-infertility-on-blu-ray.php/comment-page-1#comment-111180</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Funn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=16057#comment-111180</guid>
		<description>Remember when the blu-ray supporters touted it as being superior due to BD50? well here we are with blu-ray as the winner and surprise! BD50 costs to much, take BD25 instead. Less then HD-DVD had...

And then we have the blu-ray association saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5051502/blu+ray-association-wallet+slaying-prices-here-to-stay-because-youre-not-buying-enough-blu+ray&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; High prices are here to stay because we don&#039;t buy enough blu-ray&lt;/a&gt;. does that not seem backwards to anyone?

The only reason sony wanted to win this war was to get rid of physical media entirely, they want us to buy PPV and limited time downloads over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when the blu-ray supporters touted it as being superior due to BD50? well here we are with blu-ray as the winner and surprise! BD50 costs to much, take BD25 instead. Less then HD-DVD had&#8230;</p>
<p>And then we have the blu-ray association saying that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5051502/blu+ray-association-wallet+slaying-prices-here-to-stay-because-youre-not-buying-enough-blu+ray" rel="nofollow"> High prices are here to stay because we don&#8217;t buy enough blu-ray</a>. does that not seem backwards to anyone?</p>
<p>The only reason sony wanted to win this war was to get rid of physical media entirely, they want us to buy PPV and limited time downloads over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Funn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/blu-ray-report/baby-mama-leatherheads-find-infertility-on-blu-ray.php/comment-page-1#comment-204225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Funn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=16057#comment-204225</guid>
		<description>Remember when the blu-ray supporters touted it as being superior due to BD50? well here we are with blu-ray as the winner and surprise! BD50 costs to much, take BD25 instead. Less then HD-DVD had...

And then we have the blu-ray association saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5051502/blu+ray-association-wallet+slaying-prices-here-to-stay-because-youre-not-buying-enough-blu+ray&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; High prices are here to stay because we don&#039;t buy enough blu-ray&lt;/a&gt;. does that not seem backwards to anyone?

The only reason sony wanted to win this war was to get rid of physical media entirely, they want us to buy PPV and limited time downloads over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when the blu-ray supporters touted it as being superior due to BD50? well here we are with blu-ray as the winner and surprise! BD50 costs to much, take BD25 instead. Less then HD-DVD had&#8230;</p>
<p>And then we have the blu-ray association saying that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5051502/blu+ray-association-wallet+slaying-prices-here-to-stay-because-youre-not-buying-enough-blu+ray" rel="nofollow"> High prices are here to stay because we don&#8217;t buy enough blu-ray</a>. does that not seem backwards to anyone?</p>
<p>The only reason sony wanted to win this war was to get rid of physical media entirely, they want us to buy PPV and limited time downloads over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 219/225 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 00:50:14 -->
